1
00:00:00,150 --> 00:00:02,140
[S01] 3月苹果更新了Mac产品线之后啊

2
00:00:02,150 --> 00:00:03,820
[S01] 我发现一个有点奇怪的事情

3
00:00:04,010 --> 00:00:05,560
[S01] 几乎没有什么博主

4
00:00:05,570 --> 00:00:07,880
[S01] 做这个M5 MacBook Air的测评啊

5
00:00:08,290 --> 00:00:08,880
[S01] 讲道理啊

6
00:00:08,890 --> 00:00:11,740
[S01] MacBook Air绝对是MacBook里面的中流砥柱

7
00:00:11,750 --> 00:00:14,380
[S01] 我们去年测试过主动散热的M5 MacBook Pro

8
00:00:14,710 --> 00:00:15,660
[S01] 今年我们就来看看

9
00:00:15,670 --> 00:00:18,260
[S01] 在M5装进了被动散热的MacBook Air之后

10
00:00:18,350 --> 00:00:19,340
[S01] 性能表现如何

11
00:00:19,620 --> 00:00:21,330
[S01] 为了让你直观了解它的性能水平

12
00:00:21,340 --> 00:00:24,650
[S01] 我们这次直接凑齐了M1到M5的13寸MacBook Air

13
00:00:24,740 --> 00:00:28,690
[S01] 来看看到底哪一代SoC在被动散热下提升最大

14
00:00:29,170 --> 00:00:30,260
[S01] 那新款MacBook Air呢

15
00:00:30,270 --> 00:00:31,300
[S01] 除了处理器以外啊

16
00:00:31,310 --> 00:00:32,860
[S01] 一切都是熟悉的配方

17
00:00:32,950 --> 00:00:34,700
[S01] 这次甚至连新配色都没有

18
00:00:34,810 --> 00:00:36,340
[S01] 所以外观没啥能聊的

19
00:00:36,430 --> 00:00:37,680
[S01] 直接来看性能表现吧

20
00:00:38,060 --> 00:00:39,130
[S01] 先来看看CPU性能

21
00:00:39,140 --> 00:00:40,650
[S01] 这代M5和前代的M4

22
00:00:40,660 --> 00:00:42,970
[S01] 用的是相同的4+6核规格的CPU

23
00:00:43,210 --> 00:00:44,420
[S01] 架构换成了新一代啊

24
00:00:44,430 --> 00:00:45,660
[S01] 频率呢也有所提升

25
00:00:45,750 --> 00:00:47,860
[S01] 那在被动散热的13寸MacBook Air里

26
00:00:47,870 --> 00:00:49,460
[S01] 历代Cinebench的多核成绩

27
00:00:49,550 --> 00:00:50,980
[S01] 都有10%到20%的提升

28
00:00:51,070 --> 00:00:52,980
[S01] 单核提升幅度呢在15%左右

29
00:00:53,130 --> 00:00:56,980
[S01] 多核成绩比主动散热的MacBook Pro M5低一点

30
00:00:57,130 --> 00:00:57,860
[S01] 那历代里呢

31
00:00:57,870 --> 00:01:00,220
[S01] CPU提升幅度最大的还得是M4

32
00:01:00,410 --> 00:01:01,860
[S01] 那在被动散热的Air里啊

33
00:01:01,870 --> 00:01:04,780
[S01] 你还是能看到M5的CPU能效确实是有进步的

34
00:01:04,970 --> 00:01:07,100
[S01] GPU基准测试3DMark SNL里

35
00:01:07,250 --> 00:01:08,940
[S01] 被动散热的MacBook Air 13

36
00:01:08,950 --> 00:01:10,740
[S01] 跑出了5098分的成绩

37
00:01:10,750 --> 00:01:13,340
[S01] 那这个成绩比MacBook Pro仅仅是稍低一点

38
00:01:13,540 --> 00:01:15,450
[S01] 相比较于前代的M4 MacBook Air啊

39
00:01:15,470 --> 00:01:16,340
[S01] 还是高了不少

40
00:01:16,500 --> 00:01:18,130
[S01] 那这个30%左右的提升幅度呢

41
00:01:18,140 --> 00:01:21,410
[S01] 也是M1到M5当中GPU提升幅度较大的一代

42
00:01:21,660 --> 00:01:23,050
[S01] 气内壁压缩和解压测试当中

43
00:01:23,060 --> 00:01:26,850
[S01] M5相较于M4的提升幅度在10%到15%左右

44
00:01:27,020 --> 00:01:27,970
[S01] 被动散热的Air呢

45
00:01:27,980 --> 00:01:30,130
[S01] 只比主动散热的Pro低了一点啊

46
00:01:30,420 --> 00:01:32,050
[S01] 那因为测试时间并不长

47
00:01:32,060 --> 00:01:34,010
[S01] 所以它还没有到这个降频的时候

48
00:01:34,440 --> 00:01:35,990
[S01] 那Blender的CPU测试当中呢

49
00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:38,950
[S01] M5相较于M4依然保持了10%左右的提升

50
00:01:39,130 --> 00:01:40,540
[S01] 宝马27这个测试场景呢

51
00:01:40,550 --> 00:01:41,660
[S01] 测试时长不短啊

52
00:01:41,670 --> 00:01:43,020
[S01] 那被动散热的MacBook Air

53
00:01:43,030 --> 00:01:45,140
[S01] 明显会比MacBook Pro要弱一些

54
00:01:45,300 --> 00:01:46,690
[S01] 基本上呢这里的提升幅度

55
00:01:46,700 --> 00:01:48,170
[S01] 就取决于能效的进步了

56
00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:49,890
[S01] 那Blender的GPU测试当中

57
00:01:49,900 --> 00:01:52,170
[S01] M5这颗GPU表现就相当的强了

58
00:01:52,290 --> 00:01:55,140
[S01] 比起M4的渲染速度几乎快了超过60%啊

59
00:01:55,300 --> 00:01:56,330
[S01] 这也进一步印证了

60
00:01:56,340 --> 00:01:58,770
[S01] M5这代GPU提升幅度比较大的印象

61
00:01:59,020 --> 00:02:01,770
[S01] 那我们接下来来看看Xcode Benchmark编译性能测试

62
00:02:02,020 --> 00:02:05,010
[S01] 这里M5相较于M4依然是快了10%出头

63
00:02:05,220 --> 00:02:06,970
[S01] 基本上长时间满载降频之后

64
00:02:06,980 --> 00:02:08,770
[S01] M5和M4的CPU差别

65
00:02:08,900 --> 00:02:10,490
[S01] 大概就是这样的一个水平了

66
00:02:10,620 --> 00:02:12,010
[S01] 那么在Pukit Bench的测试当中

67
00:02:12,020 --> 00:02:12,850
[S01] 在Photoshop里

68
00:02:12,860 --> 00:02:14,530
[S01] M5的提升幅度不算特别大

69
00:02:14,690 --> 00:02:15,620
[S01] 那在这个测试里呢

70
00:02:15,630 --> 00:02:17,060
[S01] CPU是关键因素啊

71
00:02:17,070 --> 00:02:17,940
[S01] 所以你会看到

72
00:02:18,060 --> 00:02:19,970
[S01] M4这代的提升是比较明显的

73
00:02:20,220 --> 00:02:21,050
[S01] 但在PR里面

74
00:02:21,060 --> 00:02:22,930
[S01] M5的提升幅度就相当可观了

75
00:02:23,180 --> 00:02:26,770
[S01] 因为PR对编解码器和GPU的要求要比PS敏感的多啊

76
00:02:26,860 --> 00:02:28,930
[S01] 所以M5的性能收益就很明显了

77
00:02:29,060 --> 00:02:31,370
[S01] 那M5这代的GPU性能提升很明显啊

78
00:02:31,380 --> 00:02:34,050
[S01] 如果你用的软件GPU参与度是比较高的

79
00:02:34,130 --> 00:02:35,580
[S01] 或者是和AI相关的

80
00:02:35,660 --> 00:02:37,850
[S01] 那它的性能提升感知就是比较强的

81
00:02:38,130 --> 00:02:39,380
[S01] 比如说这张RAW照片啊

82
00:02:39,470 --> 00:02:40,860
[S01] 那么在Photoshop Camera RAW里

83
00:02:40,870 --> 00:02:42,820
[S01] 我们用它的神经网络降噪功能啊

84
00:02:42,830 --> 00:02:45,260
[S01] 把这张Z8拍的高ISO的照片降个噪

85
00:02:45,580 --> 00:02:48,450
[S01] 你能明显感觉到M5的Air比M4的快

86
00:02:48,660 --> 00:02:50,050
[S01] 而且因为这个时间不长啊

87
00:02:50,060 --> 00:02:53,050
[S01] 所以被动散热的M5 Air也没有比Pro慢多少

88
00:02:53,380 --> 00:02:56,970
[S01] 同样的情况也出现在Logic Pro的这个大分轨拆分器里面

89
00:02:57,130 --> 00:02:57,860
[S01] 那这个功能呢

90
00:02:57,870 --> 00:02:59,260
[S01] 是利用AI把一首歌

91
00:02:59,270 --> 00:03:01,260
[S01] 拆成几个乐器分别的分轨

92
00:03:01,420 --> 00:03:02,370
[S01] 非常有用的一个功能

93
00:03:02,380 --> 00:03:04,890
[S01] 那M5的Air在这里也明显比M4要快

94
00:03:05,130 --> 00:03:07,060
[S01] 所以这些以利用GPU为主

95
00:03:07,070 --> 00:03:08,980
[S01] 或者是AI相关的生产力应用

96
00:03:09,130 --> 00:03:11,880
[S01] 那你能感觉到M5这代的提升是比较显著的

97
00:03:12,220 --> 00:03:13,010
[S01] 所以很明显啊

98
00:03:13,020 --> 00:03:15,330
[S01] M5这代的GPU提升才是重头戏

99
00:03:15,420 --> 00:03:16,650
[S01] 那这也让我很好奇啊

100
00:03:16,660 --> 00:03:19,770
[S01] M5放在MacBook Air这种被动散热的机身里

101
00:03:19,970 --> 00:03:21,420
[S01] 游戏表现会怎么样啊

102
00:03:21,570 --> 00:03:23,700
[S01] 那MacBook Air 13寸这款机型啊

103
00:03:23,710 --> 00:03:25,180
[S01] 由于被动散热的原因

104
00:03:25,370 --> 00:03:26,300
[S01] 游戏里的性能

105
00:03:26,310 --> 00:03:29,300
[S01] 相比较于主动散热机型的差距是相当大的

106
00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:32,170
[S01] 那M5会不会凭借着GPU优秀的能效表现

107
00:03:32,260 --> 00:03:33,730
[S01] 给我们一些惊喜呢

108
00:03:33,970 --> 00:03:35,260
[S01] 直接上2077试试看啊

109
00:03:35,270 --> 00:03:36,940
[S01] 1920x1200分辨率

110
00:03:36,950 --> 00:03:38,780
[S01] 低画质不开超分的情况下

111
00:03:38,790 --> 00:03:41,340
[S01] M5的MacBook Air跑出了36帧的平均帧

112
00:03:41,680 --> 00:03:43,830
[S01] 比M4的Air提升了接近35%啊

113
00:03:43,840 --> 00:03:47,550
[S01] 那这个提升幅度也成为了M1到M5历代里提升最大的一代

114
00:03:47,990 --> 00:03:49,460
[S01] 看起来在被动散热机身里

115
00:03:49,470 --> 00:03:52,340
[S01] M5的游戏能效比M4是有巨大进步的

116
00:03:52,640 --> 00:03:55,170
[S01] 那在开启了Metal FX质量档超分之后

117
00:03:55,260 --> 00:03:57,530
[S01] M5的Air跑出了54帧的平均帧

118
00:03:57,660 --> 00:03:59,010
[S01] 比起M4的领先幅度

119
00:03:59,020 --> 00:04:01,010
[S01] 进一步拉大到了接近40%啊

120
00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:02,930
[S01] 那这颗新GPU确实给力

121
00:04:03,020 --> 00:04:03,930
[S01] 那么这台Air

122
00:04:03,980 --> 00:04:08,010
[S01] 和同为M5带风扇的MacBook Pro相比又如何呢

123
00:04:08,320 --> 00:04:09,430
[S01] 那13寸的MacBook Air

124
00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:11,750
[S01] 在持续运行2077这样的游戏时呢

125
00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:14,270
[S01] SoC的功耗稳定下来就只有不到10W了

126
00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:16,710
[S01] 那在键盘表面温度比较高的情况下

127
00:04:16,820 --> 00:04:19,830
[S01] 长时间运行之后甚至会降到6W左右

128
00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:21,630
[S01] 我做了一张不同功率下

129
00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:23,190
[S01] 它的2077帧数曲线啊

130
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:24,110
[S01] 你可以参考一下

131
00:04:24,380 --> 00:04:25,810
[S01] 而带风扇的MacBook Pro

132
00:04:25,820 --> 00:04:27,330
[S01] 在长时间运行之后的功耗

133
00:04:27,330 --> 00:04:29,570
[S01] 大概还是保持在20W左右

134
00:04:29,770 --> 00:04:30,780
[S01] 这样的功耗差距

135
00:04:30,790 --> 00:04:33,660
[S01] 也就带来了40%的实际性能差距啊

136
00:04:33,890 --> 00:04:36,220
[S01] 那么在长时间运行2077这样的大型游戏时

137
00:04:36,230 --> 00:04:38,820
[S01] 那M5的带风扇的MacBook Pro

138
00:04:38,930 --> 00:04:40,980
[S01] 帧数差不多要高出40%

139
00:04:41,130 --> 00:04:43,940
[S01] 所以如果你的应用需要长时间满载运行

140
00:04:44,130 --> 00:04:46,940
[S01] 主动散热的MacBook Pro依然是更好的选择

141
00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:49,270
[S01] 那其他游戏的情况也和2077类似

142
00:04:49,290 --> 00:04:51,940
[S01] 那在伯德之门3当中1200P低画质

143
00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,670
[S01] M5的Air在开始时是可以跑到60帧的

144
00:04:54,810 --> 00:04:56,260
[S01] 那随着运行时间变长

145
00:04:56,270 --> 00:04:57,860
[S01] 逐渐会降低到50帧以下

146
00:04:58,200 --> 00:04:59,010
[S01] M4的Air呢

147
00:04:59,020 --> 00:05:01,370
[S01] 则会在刚开始的时候跑出47到48帧

148
00:05:01,540 --> 00:05:03,730
[S01] 一段时间之后稳定在30帧出头

149
00:05:03,980 --> 00:05:05,990
[S01] M5的Air比M4的Air强不少

150
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:08,710
[S01] 但主动散热的MacBook Pro还是明显有优势啊

151
00:05:08,860 --> 00:05:10,890
[S01] 基本可以一直稳定在60帧以上

152
00:05:11,380 --> 00:05:14,050
[S01] 那转移的Air灯法环里1200P低画质

153
00:05:14,140 --> 00:05:16,130
[S01] M5 Air刚开始能跑满60帧

154
00:05:16,140 --> 00:05:18,850
[S01] 那一段时间降频之后会掉到50帧左右

155
00:05:19,060 --> 00:05:19,850
[S01] M4的Air呢

156
00:05:19,860 --> 00:05:22,210
[S01] 则会从50帧左右逐渐掉到30多帧

157
00:05:22,540 --> 00:05:24,050
[S01] 主动散热的M5 MacBook Pro呢

158
00:05:24,060 --> 00:05:25,450
[S01] 依然可以全程跑到60帧

159
00:05:25,470 --> 00:05:26,740
[S01] 那这代M5的Air

160
00:05:26,890 --> 00:05:28,340
[S01] 虽然说被动散热下

161
00:05:28,430 --> 00:05:30,780
[S01] 游戏性能相较前代提升不少

162
00:05:30,870 --> 00:05:32,380
[S01] 但是和主动散热机型相比

163
00:05:32,470 --> 00:05:34,260
[S01] 依然有着不小的持续性的差距

164
00:05:34,540 --> 00:05:37,330
[S01] 那你们也知道续航是MacBook的传统优势啊

165
00:05:37,500 --> 00:05:39,790
[S01] 那这代MacBook Air 13测下来呢

166
00:05:39,930 --> 00:05:42,060
[S01] 续航时间呢是12小时左右

167
00:05:42,300 --> 00:05:45,250
[S01] 这个成绩基本上和M4的Air相比没啥区别

168
00:05:45,410 --> 00:05:46,940
[S01] 还是一个比较优秀的水平

169
00:05:47,250 --> 00:05:49,540
[S01] 那比起14寸的M5 MacBook Pro呢

170
00:05:49,550 --> 00:05:50,460
[S01] 是要短一些的

171
00:05:50,750 --> 00:05:51,500
[S01] 但我要说的是

172
00:05:51,510 --> 00:05:53,340
[S01] 随着Lunar Lake和Panther Lake的推出

173
00:05:53,500 --> 00:05:56,130
[S01] Windows阵营轻薄本的续航表现也逐渐赶上来了

174
00:05:56,280 --> 00:05:59,070
[S01] 比如说定位相近的小米Book Pro 14的续航时间

175
00:05:59,180 --> 00:06:00,530
[S01] 也已经有9个多小时

176
00:06:00,540 --> 00:06:01,530
[S01] 快10个小时了

177
00:06:01,770 --> 00:06:03,620
[S01] 那如果重量稍微重一些的

178
00:06:03,710 --> 00:06:05,620
[S01] 调教比较用心的Windows笔记本

179
00:06:05,710 --> 00:06:09,140
[S01] 现在它们的续航是可以做到接近这台MacBook Air的

180
00:06:09,500 --> 00:06:12,090
[S01] 那我们简单测试了一下M5 MacBook Air之后呢

181
00:06:12,100 --> 00:06:12,810
[S01] 你就知道啊

182
00:06:12,820 --> 00:06:14,410
[S01] 这个MacBook Air它是那种

183
00:06:14,620 --> 00:06:16,330
[S01] 你知道一定不会差

184
00:06:16,500 --> 00:06:18,170
[S01] 但是这种常规更新下

185
00:06:18,180 --> 00:06:20,130
[S01] 很难让你眼前一亮的产品

186
00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:22,450
[S01] 如果你不好好测试一下它的性能表现

187
00:06:22,540 --> 00:06:25,890
[S01] 你都不知道M5对于MacBook Air的意义到底在哪啊

188
00:06:26,210 --> 00:06:28,060
[S01] 那M5这代Air的性能提升幅度

189
00:06:28,070 --> 00:06:29,900
[S01] 在历代里都属于相对比较大的

190
00:06:30,050 --> 00:06:31,880
[S01] 主要是GPU的提升相当显著

191
00:06:32,020 --> 00:06:34,290
[S01] 加上16+512G起步的配置

192
00:06:34,540 --> 00:06:37,970
[S01] 我个人觉得它就是目前最值得入手的MacBook新品

193
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:39,290
[S01] 不过话又说回来啊

194
00:06:39,300 --> 00:06:42,570
[S01] MacBook Air这代模具已经陪伴我们4年了

195
00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:46,410
[S01] 我还是希望看到下一代MacBook Air能够焕然一新啊

196
00:06:46,700 --> 00:06:49,330
[S01] 毕竟吸引人购买MacBook Air

197
00:06:49,340 --> 00:06:51,730
[S01] 最大的理由从来都不会是性能

198
00:06:51,820 --> 00:06:52,410
[S01] 你说对吧

199
00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:54,350
[S01] 那以上就是本期节目的全部内容了

200
00:06:54,360 --> 00:06:54,950
[S01] 喜欢我们的节目

201
00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:56,470
[S01] 别忘了长按点赞支持我们一下

202
00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:57,510
[S01] 也别忘了关注我们的频道

203
00:06:57,520 --> 00:06:59,110
[S01] 我们下期节目再见